the F.D.A./VAERS October 2020 release of information, they WERE absolutely aware that these physical consequences & injuries WERE highly likely to occur, possibly in a profuse enough number to merit an INCREASE in vigilance regarding them, preemptively ready to IMMEDIATELY withdraw & halt the roll outs, & STOP 'em ALTOGETHER.
Historically, with any less of a "military prototypey", LESS novel product (bearing in mind that these were THE first mRNA products to "pass muster" for experimentation on the public) one would imagine that they SHOULD'VE been IMMEDIATELY withdrawn?? But then, the profiteering ghouls of biopharmaceutical industrial complex cartels, in seeming collusion with the "regulatory" (Ha!😆) bodies are well known for rushing out potential "money-spinners" they KNEW had glaringly apparent safety signals, and THEN, at a later date, when enough profits had been accrued to
generate a clear profit margin, over and above any later pesky compensation claims, pull them back OFF of the market. Yet, even in
prescient expectation & assured anticipation of the coming tidal wave of death & damage reports, even as wilfuly compromised & corrupt as the reporting mechanisms like VAERS & the Yellow Card system are, when the full horror DID indeed manifest- they did NOTHING, & WORSE STILL,
they fudged & smudged, HID & diluted their own advice to make absolutely SURE that the roll outs continued, unmolested. I sincerely hope that smirking bitch June R. burns in the lowest pit of Hell for ALL eternity for this. She should be broken on the rack, death of a 1000 cuts, an AEON of the sublimest agonies for EVERY single dead and damaged victim of these evil, EVIL depop/clot-shot/"military prototype"/ lethal, graphene oxide laden, self assembling nano-matrice ridden, LNP/virulent toxic jabs, and even THAT would fall FAR short of what she deserves! (Dearest 77 brigade, the prior statement was, of COURSE, entirely in the nature of comedic jest, & was, in no sense whatsoever, intended as ANY literal statement of harmful intent towards
the evil, ugly, shrivelled, scheming CU#T referred to, OK, TRAITORS?).
Doesn't seem likely Alan, does it? There is now NO single act of fraudulence, nor dastardly complicity, nor premeditation I think
them incapable of. At this point, the so called "regulatory" bodies are nothing short of an advanced marketing/promotional/public relations and "customer complaints"
edifice FOR the biopharmaceutical industrial complex cartel, seems like? There is NO clear demarcation nor boundary between them and the biopharmaceutical industrial complex cartels (although, horrifyingly, as has been SHOWN by the likes of Sasha Latypova and strongly indicated by La Quinta Columna, the D.o.D./defence contractors & "alphabet" agencies of the intelligence apparatus are all mixed up in this TOO!!?). The people of the world have clearly been "guinea pigged" in something far more sinister and abhorrent than even an undeclared experiment or "test": as Dr.Ricardo Delgado of La Quinta Columna rightly has it- "they have planned for EVERY eventuality in advance!" & NOT in ANY sense commensurate with "pre-planning/pandemic preparedness" nor pro-activity regarding any kind of "public health response". I strongly recommend that you (that EVERYONE!) watches the recent almost 3 hour long La Quinta Columna presentation, where Dr.Delgado rips the whole fraudulent fantasy of a "pandemic and vaccine" to SHREDS, and exposes much of it as being something FAR more sinister.
I have read that they used saline in their phase 3 trials and no placebo in the first trial.
I have come across this comment on their trial.....
'No RNA Control Included
The Sars-Cov-2 vaccines are different from conventional vaccines in that mRNA alone is a powerful adjuvant.
The Sars-Cov-2 vaccine trials only compared risk of getting covid-19 between the vaccine group and the saline group. Without having immunized a group with a non-coding mRNA as a negative control for RNA-induced activation of innate immunity, nothing can be said (accurately) about what the antibodies elicited to the virus are doing with regard to protection against Sars-Cov-2. The 'protective' effect attributed to the vaccine does not rule out adjuvant effects conferred by the inflammatory state elicited by RNA alone.
Do you know what the outcome of submitting a vaccine design grant or a manuscript and not including an adjuvant control? Not discussed. Rejected.
All successful and failed vaccine trials have one thing in common: they all report the induction of specific antibodies. So what? Without ruling out adjuvant effects the antibody response in the case of Sars-Cov-2 cannot be interpreted accurately without more time elapsing'.
I have read that Moderna is the only company that admits that it did not use a saline placebo in its phase one trial. It used no placebo as it performed a purely observational study.
In the phase 3 trial that began on July 27, 2020, participants were apparently given either two100 microgram doses of the investigational 'vaccine' or two shots of saline placebo, 28 days apart. In January 2021 they offered the "vaccine" to everybody and they said many people who had been in the placebo group, opted to take the 'vaccine'.
The Sars-Cov-2 vaccines are different from conventional vaccines in that mRNA alone is a powerful adjuvant. The Sars-Cov-2 vaccine trials only compared risk of getting covid-19 between the vaccine group and the saline group. Without having immunized a group with a non-coding mRNA as a negative control for RNA-induced activation of innate immunity, nothing can be said (accurately) about what the antibodies elicited to the virus are doing with regard to protection against Sars-Cov-2. The 'protective' effect attributed to the vaccine does not rule out adjuvant effects conferred by the inflammatory state elicited by RNA alone.
Do you know what the outcome of submitting a vaccine design grant or a manuscript and not including an adjuvant control? Not discussed. Rejected.
All successful and failed vaccine trials have one thing in common: they all report the induction of specific antibodies. So what? Without ruling out adjuvant effects the antibody response in the case of Sars-Cov-2 cannot be interpreted accurately without more time elapsing".
Plus, judging from, at the very least,
the F.D.A./VAERS October 2020 release of information, they WERE absolutely aware that these physical consequences & injuries WERE highly likely to occur, possibly in a profuse enough number to merit an INCREASE in vigilance regarding them, preemptively ready to IMMEDIATELY withdraw & halt the roll outs, & STOP 'em ALTOGETHER.
Historically, with any less of a "military prototypey", LESS novel product (bearing in mind that these were THE first mRNA products to "pass muster" for experimentation on the public) one would imagine that they SHOULD'VE been IMMEDIATELY withdrawn?? But then, the profiteering ghouls of biopharmaceutical industrial complex cartels, in seeming collusion with the "regulatory" (Ha!😆) bodies are well known for rushing out potential "money-spinners" they KNEW had glaringly apparent safety signals, and THEN, at a later date, when enough profits had been accrued to
generate a clear profit margin, over and above any later pesky compensation claims, pull them back OFF of the market. Yet, even in
prescient expectation & assured anticipation of the coming tidal wave of death & damage reports, even as wilfuly compromised & corrupt as the reporting mechanisms like VAERS & the Yellow Card system are, when the full horror DID indeed manifest- they did NOTHING, & WORSE STILL,
they fudged & smudged, HID & diluted their own advice to make absolutely SURE that the roll outs continued, unmolested. I sincerely hope that smirking bitch June R. burns in the lowest pit of Hell for ALL eternity for this. She should be broken on the rack, death of a 1000 cuts, an AEON of the sublimest agonies for EVERY single dead and damaged victim of these evil, EVIL depop/clot-shot/"military prototype"/ lethal, graphene oxide laden, self assembling nano-matrice ridden, LNP/virulent toxic jabs, and even THAT would fall FAR short of what she deserves! (Dearest 77 brigade, the prior statement was, of COURSE, entirely in the nature of comedic jest, & was, in no sense whatsoever, intended as ANY literal statement of harmful intent towards
the evil, ugly, shrivelled, scheming CU#T referred to, OK, TRAITORS?).
That bar chart makes me wonder what Moderna used as a placebo in their trials. It doesn’t look like saline with those numbers of ARs.
Doesn't seem likely Alan, does it? There is now NO single act of fraudulence, nor dastardly complicity, nor premeditation I think
them incapable of. At this point, the so called "regulatory" bodies are nothing short of an advanced marketing/promotional/public relations and "customer complaints"
edifice FOR the biopharmaceutical industrial complex cartel, seems like? There is NO clear demarcation nor boundary between them and the biopharmaceutical industrial complex cartels (although, horrifyingly, as has been SHOWN by the likes of Sasha Latypova and strongly indicated by La Quinta Columna, the D.o.D./defence contractors & "alphabet" agencies of the intelligence apparatus are all mixed up in this TOO!!?). The people of the world have clearly been "guinea pigged" in something far more sinister and abhorrent than even an undeclared experiment or "test": as Dr.Ricardo Delgado of La Quinta Columna rightly has it- "they have planned for EVERY eventuality in advance!" & NOT in ANY sense commensurate with "pre-planning/pandemic preparedness" nor pro-activity regarding any kind of "public health response". I strongly recommend that you (that EVERYONE!) watches the recent almost 3 hour long La Quinta Columna presentation, where Dr.Delgado rips the whole fraudulent fantasy of a "pandemic and vaccine" to SHREDS, and exposes much of it as being something FAR more sinister.
I have read that they used saline in their phase 3 trials and no placebo in the first trial.
I have come across this comment on their trial.....
'No RNA Control Included
The Sars-Cov-2 vaccines are different from conventional vaccines in that mRNA alone is a powerful adjuvant.
The Sars-Cov-2 vaccine trials only compared risk of getting covid-19 between the vaccine group and the saline group. Without having immunized a group with a non-coding mRNA as a negative control for RNA-induced activation of innate immunity, nothing can be said (accurately) about what the antibodies elicited to the virus are doing with regard to protection against Sars-Cov-2. The 'protective' effect attributed to the vaccine does not rule out adjuvant effects conferred by the inflammatory state elicited by RNA alone.
Do you know what the outcome of submitting a vaccine design grant or a manuscript and not including an adjuvant control? Not discussed. Rejected.
All successful and failed vaccine trials have one thing in common: they all report the induction of specific antibodies. So what? Without ruling out adjuvant effects the antibody response in the case of Sars-Cov-2 cannot be interpreted accurately without more time elapsing'.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389?page=1#article_comments
I have read that Moderna is the only company that admits that it did not use a saline placebo in its phase one trial. It used no placebo as it performed a purely observational study.
In the phase 3 trial that began on July 27, 2020, participants were apparently given either two100 microgram doses of the investigational 'vaccine' or two shots of saline placebo, 28 days apart. In January 2021 they offered the "vaccine" to everybody and they said many people who had been in the placebo group, opted to take the 'vaccine'.
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/peer-reviewed-report-moderna-covid-19-vaccine-publishes
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni
I have also read this comment on the trial...
"No RNA Control Included.
The Sars-Cov-2 vaccines are different from conventional vaccines in that mRNA alone is a powerful adjuvant. The Sars-Cov-2 vaccine trials only compared risk of getting covid-19 between the vaccine group and the saline group. Without having immunized a group with a non-coding mRNA as a negative control for RNA-induced activation of innate immunity, nothing can be said (accurately) about what the antibodies elicited to the virus are doing with regard to protection against Sars-Cov-2. The 'protective' effect attributed to the vaccine does not rule out adjuvant effects conferred by the inflammatory state elicited by RNA alone.
Do you know what the outcome of submitting a vaccine design grant or a manuscript and not including an adjuvant control? Not discussed. Rejected.
All successful and failed vaccine trials have one thing in common: they all report the induction of specific antibodies. So what? Without ruling out adjuvant effects the antibody response in the case of Sars-Cov-2 cannot be interpreted accurately without more time elapsing".
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2035389?page=1#article_comments