Were the MHRA striking a deal for a Covid vaccine as early as September 2019?

Lawyers needed NOW! Evidence of brazen corruption in plain view

*Image from the GPC Files, Volume 1

As new evidence from Andrew Bridgen emerges that a whistleblower raised the alarm to some members of the security services with foreknowledge of the Covid-19 “pandemic” as early as August 2019 (from 8:41 here), stunning new evidence from the files of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency supercharges the Rishi Sunak Moderna share scandal where he registered a blind trust in July 2019 and apparently profited off the financial success of Moderna who at the time was unsuccessful in producing a medicine for 9 years. How did he know to invest?

Questions are now arising as to the level of foreknowledge of Covid-19 in the UK. How far back did it go? Was foreknowledge widespread? Who were the players involved?

The new problems with the MHRA have emerged from their use of the Government Procurement Cards (GPCs) which according to the GPC Files, Volume 1 “were introduced in Whitehall in 1997 to increase the efficiency and convenience of procurement for relatively low-value goods or services, especially where such purchases needed to be made at speed, in bulk, or by staff out on the road”.

The meaning of what “relatively low-value” actually is will shortly be revealed but because of the inevitable misuse of such an easy way of transacting, the report also highlighted that “In 2011, following publicity around reported misuse of GPCs, the Cabinet Office introduced a number of reforms, including requiring departments to publish a list of all transactions with a value above £500, and announcing the creation of a GPC Steering Group, charged with establishing a central GPC policy for how cards should be used across Whitehall, and sharing best practice between departments”.

Furthermore, the report reveals that in “In December 2017 , the Crown Commercial Service (CCS) published a four-page “pan-government policy” – via the Cabinet Office website” setting out requirements that “all transactions of £500 and over should be published on a monthly basis, including the date, reference, amount spent and merchant name” and stating that “publishing such data will bring visibility to the use of payment cards and is a proactive step to evidence control and compliance within a payment card programme.”

In short, for evidence control and compliance purposes, monthly statements of all payments over £500 should be published for these Government Procurement Cards, bear that in mind.

Well here now is hard evidence that the UK’s drug and vaccine regulator, the MHRA, have been covering up their financial activities. Before you look at the following image, if skullduggery was taking place, ask yourself when would be the prime period in time for this to occur? Any guesses?

The 6 months before the “pandemic”? Yes and here is access to that evidence here. Barring December 2012, datasets for usage of the Government Procurement Card (over £500) are available continuously for every single month since April 2011 yet cease abruptly after September 2019 for reasons undisclosed. The last dated entries are on 6th September 2019 for fees for conferences and training.

Transactions resume again on 11th March 2020 as if no problems had ever occurred, these payments being held in the April data file. Payments beyond July 2020 also do continue monthly in data collections elsewhere but yield no data for the 6 months in question.

What is missing is gravely concerning. Before standardisation in April 2020 supposedly motivated by the “pandemic”, it was the role of each department to set transaction and monthly limits meaning large payments could potentially have been made over and over again leading to a massive hidden final bill. These datasets cover payments from £500 up to £24,999 per transaction.

The missing data raises the following: Is the missing data related to Covid-19 foreknowledge? How much money is unaccounted for? Who was paid off? Was Prime Minister Rishi Sunak involved? And the very pertinent question: Was it for a vaccine?

Skullduggery isn’t unprecented. In the section titled “Miscellaneous and Mystery purchases” the same report raises concerns that“the GPC data is littered with further examples of seemingly random purchases or unexplained spending”. These concerns include the purchase of 13 fine art photographs from The Tate Gallery at a cost of £3,393 from Rishi Sunak’s very own Treasury at the time he was Chancellor of the Exchequer, a curiosity rather than a proven gotcha perhaps?

However, in addition to an entire section devoted toward the accountability problems at The Ministry of Defence, the report further reveals that “there have been a number of transparency disclosures by other departments in recent months that only came about because of errors and omissions pointed out by Labour, including: the publication by BEIS of the correct month of GPC data for April 2020; the publication of previously missing months of DHSC and HO GPC data for August 2021 and January 2022 respectively; the publication of missing dates for all transactions made by the Cabinet Office in September 2021” (etc)

One or two missing months corrected here and there? How about a whole 6 consecutive months worth of payment data still missing during a sensitive pre-pandemic time period from a regulatory health agency which is 86% funded by big pharma and who then went on to authorise highly dangerous vaccines which made the manufacturers hundreds of millions of pounds in the UK of which the so-called pandemic was the catalyst?

Lawyers needed URGENTLY!

What is in those missing datasets?

Can you unlock the plandemic??

I’m available in DM or in the comment section. If anyone can somehow find these missing datasets, please do let me know! Please feel free to share or highlight this post or even start your own investigations. We need to know!