I haven’t read the Act, but it hails from a different age and no doubt incorporates a different standard of safety.
Interesting that the quote in the BBC article from AstraZeneca copied below includes the phraseology you are highlighting.
It added evidence from clinical trials and data showed the Covid vaccine had "an acceptable safety profile" and that the benefits "outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects".
Very interesting, yet more evidence standards have slid into a very expedient standard of care. This needs to be stopped. Thanks for reading my article, appreciate.
Norman Fenton linked to your other article. I thought I had subscribed to most of the Covid related substacks but more and more emerge. At one time, evidence like this would be used by HM Opposition to hold the government to account but it seems they are all in it together.
It’s interesting that the legal action which includes Lisa Shaw’s husband is being brought under the Consumer Protection Act 1987.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-65187992
I haven’t read the Act, but it hails from a different age and no doubt incorporates a different standard of safety.
Interesting that the quote in the BBC article from AstraZeneca copied below includes the phraseology you are highlighting.
It added evidence from clinical trials and data showed the Covid vaccine had "an acceptable safety profile" and that the benefits "outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects".
Very interesting, yet more evidence standards have slid into a very expedient standard of care. This needs to be stopped. Thanks for reading my article, appreciate.
Norman Fenton linked to your other article. I thought I had subscribed to most of the Covid related substacks but more and more emerge. At one time, evidence like this would be used by HM Opposition to hold the government to account but it seems they are all in it together.