Maybe the MHRA are nothing more than bystanders holding rubber stamps because the injections are distributed under a military umbrella and are regarded not as medicines but rather as 'medical counter measures'. Normal rules do not apply. All this was planned, including the way to get round any legal liability for anybody involved in their manufacture, distribution and administration.
Yes but they saved us all from Night Nurse, Sudafed and Nurofen which had been on the market for 30 years. They must have killed millions!
https://www.gov.uk/drug-device-alerts/class-2-medicines-recall-various-marketing-authorisation-holders-pholcodine-containing-products-el-23-a-slash-09
https://news.sky.com/story/some-cough-cold-and-flu-medicines-are-being-taken-off-shelves-as-a-precaution-heres-the-list-12833417
Brilliant. You should send your article on to Debbie Evans of UK Column news.
Maybe the MHRA are nothing more than bystanders holding rubber stamps because the injections are distributed under a military umbrella and are regarded not as medicines but rather as 'medical counter measures'. Normal rules do not apply. All this was planned, including the way to get round any legal liability for anybody involved in their manufacture, distribution and administration.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/how-the-us-weaponised-the-war-on-covid/
Focusing on VAERS, I found that 85% are serious, not the 20% figure cited:
https://deepdots.substack.com/p/85-are-serious-in-vaers-reports-not
(No one can prove that wrong so both sides just ignore it)
I landed here because Stephen commented on this Peter McCullough post and I can't comment there because I'm not paying:
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/18204-myopericarditis-cases-from/comments
Only 18,204 ???
These are 39,750 reports (218%) with 'myocard' in VAERS over that same limited time frame (including 450 since-deleted):
https://univaers.com/download/special/myocard_thru_march_2022.xlsx
Why are analysts
constantly understating the problem?